Dear CNBC Managers, I’d like to Thank some of your great staff who have always maintained very professional, non-biased, and level headed analysis regardless how unstable the market is. These are your Best people you have who we as viewers really Trust and listen. Will you kindly First Thank the following staff for us: David Faber, Andrew Sorkin, Becky Quick, Melissa Lee, Carl Quintanlla, Steve Liebsman, Bob Pisano, Julie Bootstin, Sue Herrera, the auto reporter, and Ron( glasses ;bald), etc. When these people talk, we listen. They have helped me a making many good decisions lot in my investment. Thank you. However, there is one person on CMBC morning (Kerner) is so irrational, hot temper, and political that he has and will turn many viewers away. We don’t need his political agenda to make investment decision. The Bond person also has hot temper. You just don’t see Bloomberg TV staff displays such unprofessional behavior. CNBC managers need to address this issue. It’s simply absurd and so unprofessional. On the other hand, Sue Herera May not give the best analysis, but she is always professional. I think I these two people an learn from Herera andsnyvofvhis colleagues. I’ve been watching CNBC since 1992. I’ve went through several real bad markets and lost lot, and finally learned why and how the technical professional making their proper decisions. So I am able to float a little this time around. Thanks to some of your great staff!

I paid for an annual “Pro” subscription and found no value to its content. As far as I’m aware this app may be the best place for high-latency data of poor quality and non-GAAP absurdly manipulated metrics which creates “slightly” misleading “information” like positive EPS values for companies that have no earnings… until the company invents their own false system of accounting to “adjust” their losses into “gains” which exist solely in the minds of adjusting-perpetrators and the numbers next to “EPS” in apps like this which fail to include an asterisk for fine print which reads something equivalent to “this number is for novelty use only” and like the entirety of our cable channel and “news” in this app: everything you see and hear is a thinly veiled commercial to promote retail transactions and provide thirsty “professionals” a chance to plug their name and/or business.The paucity of non-paywalled articles is almost as bad as the “writing” within those “articles” — if you still use CNBC as your primary source of information for investment and/or trading purposes I must suggest you reconsider the being a market participant.If however you enjoy AI-generated trash amended and/or edited by incompetent editors or find countless anecdotes of the same nature riveting à la “A Person Makes Money w/ a Job - Here’s How They Do It” and/or “Someone Wants to Plug Themselves alongside 5 Common Sense ‘Tips’” perhaps you will enjoy what this app now offers.